Friday, September 16, 2016
America's Mottoes Unite Liberal and Conservative Views of Hierarchy
I previously wrote about the finding that conservatives tend to see difference as hierarchical (better or worse), whereas liberals tend to see difference as equally valuable diversity.
I think the original motto of the United States starts from this more liberal view, then tends toward the center. E Pluribus Unum - Out of Many, One - starts from the great positive value of diversity. It heads toward unity, true. But it is not a unity of an imagined purity of the nation, but rather the hybrid vigor that comes from joining different, but equally valuable, components.
The new motto of the United States, by contrast, draws from a more hierarchical view. In God We Trust names the most important thing. It does not even name the alternatives. They are not worth exploring.
The actual United States believes both. At the human level, we are diverse and equally valuable in our origins. At the transcendent level, we trust the one who really is hierarchically better - and Other - than the rest.
This unity, I believe, is a good centrist point.
Posted by Gruntled at 9:44 AM No comments:
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
Math is Not Racist, But Big Data Cannot Predict Individuals
Under the provocative title "Math is Racist," CNN Money reports on the work of mathematician Cathy O'Neil. She is distressed with the way mathematical models about groups are then used to hurt individuals. For example, the fact that the relatives of prisoners are themselves more likely to commit crimes can be used in sentencing a specific relative of a prisoner.
O'Neil is right that this is wrong, and is an injustice spurred by the increasing availability of Big Data.
The problem is one we face in sociology all the time. I have for years made my students repeat Rule #1 of Sociology (according to me): We make generalizations about groups, which do not necessarily apply to each individual in the group. So, for example, it is true that the relatives of prisoners are more likely to commit crimes. Finding that fact has been a great and important achievement of sociology. But it would be wrong to conclude that this particular relative of a prisoner is, therefore, more likely to commit crimes. Sociology cannot provide that fine-grained a solution.
Or, to use the simplified rule that I now teach students, sociologists are the people who understand the difference between most and all.
Posted by Gruntled at 10:08 AM No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)