Judith Wallerstein, the famous researcher on the effects of divorce on children, marveled that in the whole "no-fault" divorce debate in the '70s, the only issue was whether it would make the exes happier – no thought was given to the kids. The effect on the kids, in case this is still a mystery, is gut-wrenching, scarring, and long-lasting.
Now the fashion has turned to married fathers who decide that they are really gay, and therefore have to leave their wives. The New York Times article, "When the Beard is Too Painful to Remove," cites the estimate of UCLA's Gary Gates that between 1 and 2 percent of married men, or formerly married men, are gay or bisexual. The article portrayed some men as trying to have a gay life while remaining married, but most of the subjects seemed to be heading toward divorce. To be gay and still married was thought to be living in denial.
A number of the men in the article were fathers. Yet not a word, by the men, their wives, the researchers, or the reporters, was spent on the effect on the kids of dad going off to be gay. To the kids, though, their father's deepest identity is as "dad."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I read this article as well and I agree with your assessment. What I would be interested in seeing is a similar analysis of married women who are lesbians. I would speculate the the women would be much more concerned about the effect that divorce would have on their kids than about the need to hold on to their husbands.
I discovered after my father died that he probably was gay. It explained a lot of things in our painful family history. He wanted to have children and in his day, had no other options. He probably wanted to live a "normal" life.
As painful as our history was, I am grateful that my parents stayed together. There is no easy answer to a dilemma, this I know. I can say, from my experience, that my father sacrificed much and endured much for me and my siblings, as did my mother. I don't know a more beautiful way to love someone.
I have to wonder whether or not this particular problem would exist if gay marriage were legal.
The child in question would have either been adopted or born from a surrogate mother. That child would have grown up in a loving family (or at least as good a chance at a loving family as a straight couple). It would have a "different" set of parents, and we could discuss the implications of no female parent, but at least Dad wouldn't have left.
It seems that this situation is caused by one of two factors:
1. Not being sure (or correct) about your sexuality before marriage.
2. Marrying hetero because it's the only way to have kids.
Legal gay marriage would solve #2. #1 is tougher - though I think it would be easier for each person to sort out their sexuality if there weren't a stigma on one of the orientations.
And therev - Thank you very much for sharing your story.
I think there is always a market for ideologies that makes us feel better about putting our own desires ahead of other people's needs, especially dependent people. The ideology that sexual orientation is an over-riding identity is, I think, one of those convenient ideologies. Moreover, the fact that there are millions of married fathers who love their wives, in addition to having homosexual inclinations, suggests that the gay/not-gay theory is also more ideology than plain fact.
I thank those telling hard stories. I was thinking of students who have told me of fathers who "had" to leave because they discovered that they were gay.
The relevance of the "gay/not gay" theory is that it lets some people think, and even makes some people believe against their will, that if they "are" gay, then it would be dishonest and even existentially wrong to live a straight life, even if they still love their wives and want to live with their children. See my series of posts, from June 7 -9, on Michele Wolkomir's Be Not Deceived.
Post a Comment