tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16201378.post8130673471327771403..comments2023-12-28T18:17:11.191-05:00Comments on Gruntled Center: Antony Flew, DeistGruntledhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14377809238377382438noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16201378.post-65200670154971035542007-11-07T23:27:00.000-05:002007-11-07T23:27:00.000-05:00"I pity those who say it can only be one or the ot..."I pity those who say it can only be one or the other. That pity turns to fear, however, when those people ascend to positions of power."<BR/><BR/>Imagine how fearful atheists feel considering everyone in power (save one congressman) either believes in both science and god, or just the one that doesn't rhyme with shmience.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16201378.post-3436614691910375462007-11-07T14:15:00.000-05:002007-11-07T14:15:00.000-05:00It almost sounds as if Norma McCorvey would still ...It almost sounds as if Norma McCorvey would still be "Jane Roe" and happily pro-choice if only those mean pro-choicers were a bit nicer to her. That's kind of funny.<BR/><BR/>I personally don't see any conflict in believing in God and science. I pity those who say it can <B>only</B> be one or the other. That pity turns to fear, however, when those people ascend to positions of power.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16201378.post-73262142146256253932007-11-05T09:32:00.000-05:002007-11-05T09:32:00.000-05:00This article hints at another culture war, within ...This article hints at another culture war, within the community of believers. Looks like the "walk humbly with thy God" ethos has been trampled by the "We're number one!" mindset.Peter Hohhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06916196998855947137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16201378.post-63992702686876469472007-11-04T22:13:00.000-05:002007-11-04T22:13:00.000-05:00Thank you, D-rew, the article did not make clear t...Thank you, D-rew, the article did not make clear that Oppenheimer was quoting Dawkins from a public lecture with a somewhat different context than a overall assessment of Flew's conversion.sGruntledhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14377809238377382438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16201378.post-71041787484408949722007-11-04T20:32:00.000-05:002007-11-04T20:32:00.000-05:00Sory to come to his defense, but the Dawkins quote...Sory to come to his defense, but the Dawkins quote was taken out of context methinks. The comment about it in context is entirely centered around Flew's viewpoint on Intelligent Design. He said that it wasn't Flew's conversion that made him upset, but his method of affirming it. In fact he says in the same speech, "There may be good reasons for believing in a God." It was the fact that Flew converted because of Michael Behe's book "Darwin's Black Box" and Dawkins is much more an anti-IDer than he is an anti-theist. <BR/><BR/><BR/>See the whole thing here<BR/>"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AlUG3JqFHo&eurl=http://abetterhope.blogspot.com/2007/05/richard-dawkins-responds-to-flew.html"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com